Case 2405461/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Mooney v MSQD Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 2405461/2020
- Decision date
- 20 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter DATE
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Mooney
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a response to the claim within the appropriate period, so the tribunal entered judgment for the claimant in default. The tribunal held that Miss H Mooney suffered an unlawful deduction of wages and that her claim was well-founded.
The award was £875.51 net for unpaid wages between 2 and 22 January 2020, described as 14 days and three hours at £61 per day. The judgment does not break the award into separate components beyond that single sum.
A separate notice on interest accompanied the judgment and explained when statutory interest would begin if the award remained unpaid after 14 days, but the judgment itself did not quantify any interest payment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim well-founded and awarded £875.51 net for unpaid wages covering 2 to 22 January 2020, stated as 14 days and three hours at £61 per day. Judgment was entered in default because the respondent did not present a response within the appropriate period. | Upheld | — | £876 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £876
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.