Case 2405464/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Robertson v Clayton Glass Ltd FINAL HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 2405464/2020
- Decision date
- 6 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Robertson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place remotely by video on 15 December 2020 before Judge Brian Doyle sitting alone. The claimant, Mr R Robertson, was not in attendance or represented. The respondent, Clayton Glass Ltd, was represented by its Operations Director, Mr S Faulkner.
The tribunal held that the claimant was fairly dismissed by the respondent and that his complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded. On that basis, the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed.
The judgment also records that the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine the claimant's complaints of voyeurism and bullying. Those complaints were therefore not determined on their merits. The judgment was sent to the parties on 6 January 2021.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was fairly dismissed and that his complaint of unfair dismissal was not well-founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states the tribunal did not have jurisdiction to determine the claimant's complaints of voyeurism and bullying. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.