Case 2405467/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Smith v Wings Care — 2020
- Case reference
- 2405467/2020
- Decision date
- 26 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Smith
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed because the claimant withdrew the claim. It does not set out findings on the merits of the underlying complaints.
No remedy was awarded, and the judgment does not contain any assessment of compensation, liability, or facts beyond the withdrawal and dismissal. The judgment is dated 10 August 2020 and was sent to the parties on 26 August 2020.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not break out separate outcomes for individual heads of claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not break out separate outcomes for individual heads of claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not break out separate outcomes for individual heads of claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. It does not break out separate outcomes for individual heads of claim. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.