Case 2405476/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss R Foster v Nutree Life Ltd and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2405476/2019
- Decision date
- 14 April 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Warren
- Panel members
- Ms C S Jammeh, Ms C Doyle
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss R Foster
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal unanimously dismissed the claimant's disability discrimination claims. It found that Miss Foster was a disabled person, as the respondents conceded, but concluded that Nutree Life Ltd and Mr P Mroczak had not known and could not reasonably have been expected to know that she had a disability.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the disability discrimination claims were ill-founded. No monetary remedy was recorded in the judgment, and the written reasons note states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and would not be provided in writing unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's notice.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal said the disability discrimination claims were ill-founded and dismissed them. It also found the claimant was disabled, but the respondents had shown they did not know and could not reasonably have been expected to know that she had a disability. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.