Case 2405483/2021 · Employment Tribunal

Mr M M Hussain v Tesco Stores Ltd — 2022

Case reference: 2405483/2021
Decision date: 6 May 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr M M Hussain

Respondent

Tesco Stores Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The Tribunal struck out the claimant's claim for ordinary unfair dismissal under sections 95 and 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 because it had no jurisdiction to hear that claim.

The Tribunal recorded that the jurisdictional reason was that the claimant had been reinstated following a successful appeal and had returned to work under his existing terms and conditions. The judgment expressly stated that the claimant's claims of discrimination on grounds of religion and/or race under the Equality Act 2010 in relation to his dismissal were not affected by this judgment.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The claim for ordinary unfair dismissal under sections 95 and 98 Employment Rights Act 1996 was struck out for want of jurisdiction.	Struck out	—	—
Religion or belief discrimination	The judgment states that the claimant's discrimination claims on grounds of religion and/or race in relation to his dismissal were not affected by this judgment; no substantive outcome was determined.	Other	Religion or belief	—
Race discrimination	The judgment states that the claimant's discrimination claims on grounds of religion and/or race in relation to his dismissal were not affected by this judgment; no substantive outcome was determined.	Other	Race	—

Legal tests applied

3 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.