Case 2405484/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Davies v Numac Engineering Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2405484/2020
- Decision date
- 14 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the underlying merits of the case. Instead, it dealt with case management and concluded that the claim should be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
By a letter dated 24 August 2021, the tribunal gave Mr J Davies an opportunity to explain why the claim should not be struck out and to request a hearing. The reasons recorded state that he failed to make representations in writing, failed to make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The hearing listed for 1 November 2021 was cancelled. No remedy was awarded and no substantive findings on the employment claims were made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim because it had not been actively pursued. By letter dated 24 August 2021, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing, but he did not make written representations, or any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.