Case 2405498/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Khobe v ISS Facility Services Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2405498/2020
- Decision date
- 25 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sharkett
- Venue
- Manchester via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Khobe
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that the claimant brought claims concerning alleged unpaid hours worked, alleged entitlement to continued pay until the end of March 2020 after his summary dismissal on 17 February 2020, payment in lieu of accrued but untaken holiday, and unfair dismissal.
Employment Judge Sharkett, sitting alone, held that each claim was not well founded. The claims for unlawful deduction from wages, holiday pay, and unfair dismissal were all dismissed. No monetary remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim that the respondent made an unlawful deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant for hours worked was not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unlawful deduction of wages based on alleged failure to continue paying the claimant until the end of March 2020 after summary dismissal on 17 February 2020 was not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for payment in lieu of holidays accrued but not taken at the effective date of termination was not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim of unfair dismissal was not well founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.