Case 2405522/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Rigby v Electrod UK Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405522/2019
- Decision date
- 28 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Benson Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Rigby
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 31 March 2020, following a preliminary hearing on 23 March 2020, the Tribunal gave Mr Rigby an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that he had not complied with paragraphs 1.1 and 2.1 of the Tribunal's order sent on 28 November 2019 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Mr Rigby did not make written representations and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The judgment is dated 10 July 2020 and was sent to the parties on 11 August 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not restate the underlying claim type, but the case listing identifies the matter as unfair dismissal. The Tribunal struck out the claim under rule 37 because the claimant did not comply with paragraphs 1.1 and 2.1 of the order sent on 28 November 2019 and had not actively pursued the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.