Case 2405541/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Molly Murray v CDGH Pub Co Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405541/2023
- Decision date
- 4 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspinall Representation
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Molly Murray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Molly Murray brought a claim against CDGH Pub Co Limited for outstanding holiday pay. At the hearing in Liverpool on 28 July 2023, before Employment Judge Aspinall, the tribunal found that the claim succeeded and that holiday pay was due for two periods: November 2021 to April 2022 carried forward, and April 2022 to the claimant's resignation effective 23 February 2023.
For November 2021 to April 2022, the tribunal calculated entitlement on a pro rata basis for a 16/40 part-time working pattern. It recorded that a full-time entitlement of 28 days produced 12 days for the period, which reduced to 5 days after applying the claimant's hours, and that 5 days at 8 hours gave 40 hours at £9.50, resulting in £380.
For April 2022 to February 2023, the tribunal again applied the 16/40 pro rata calculation and recorded that the claimant was entitled to 10 days, or 80 hours, over that period, had taken 64 hours as leave, and was therefore due 16 hours paid at £9.50, resulting in £152. The total award was £532. The written judgment noted that the oral judgment had relied in error on figures supplied by the respondent that had not been pro rated down, which produced an erroneous figure of £981.44.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal upheld the claimant's outstanding holiday pay claim and awarded £380 for November 2021 to April 2022 and £152 for April 2022 to her resignation on 23 February 2023. The written judgment states that the oral figure of £981.44 was erroneous because it relied on respondent figures that had not been pro rated for the claimant's part-time hours. | Upheld | — | £532 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £532
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.