Case 2405554/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Kennedy v Manchester Airport plc — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405554/2019
- Decision date
- 30 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Dunlop Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss J Kennedy
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal considered a preliminary issue of jurisdiction in relation to an unfair dismissal claim. Miss Kennedy was dismissed with effect from 10 December 2018, although dismissal was confirmed in writing on 21 December 2018. The tribunal found the primary limitation period therefore expired on 9 March 2019.
The tribunal accepted that the dismissal had a severe effect on the claimant's mental health and that a medical procedure in December 2018 prevented her from taking steps to pursue her rights until after the new year. Once able to do so, she sought informal advice from Mr Lloyd, who told her that time ran from the date of the dismissal letter and that she had until 20 March 2019 to contact ACAS. The tribunal found that advice was wrong, that there was no ambiguity about the date of termination, and that it would have been reasonably practicable for the correct time limit to have been ascertained and for early conciliation to have been started in time.
Applying the authorities on reliance on advisers, the tribunal concluded that the claimant was fixed with that mistaken advice and that it had been reasonably practicable to present the claim in time. It also found, in the alternative, that even if the primary test were met, the claim was not presented within such further period as was reasonable because there was no sufficient explanation for the further delay after ACAS early conciliation. The unfair dismissal claim was therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction because the unfair dismissal claim was presented outside the time limit in s.111(2) ERA 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.111(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.207B Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonable practicability test
- Dedman principle
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.