Case 2405554/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss P Derrig v Doggo Daycare Centre — 2024
- Case reference
- 2405554/2023
- Decision date
- 25 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gibson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss P Derrig
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out Miss P Derrig’s claim after giving her an opportunity, by letter dated 14 February 2024, to make representations or request a hearing on why strike out should not follow. The reasons identified were failure to comply with Employment Judge Gibson’s case management orders requiring a schedule of loss, a disability impact statement and medical information by 27 November 2023, and the fact that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make sufficient representations, in response. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. It also recorded that the hearing listed for 18 November 2024 would not take place. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying cause(s) of action in the strike-out reasons. It records non-compliance with case management orders to provide a schedule of loss, a disability impact statement and medical information, and states that the claim was not actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.