Case 2405558/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Peter Anthony Jump v LLW Repository Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405558/2022
- Decision date
- 22 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tobin Representation
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Peter Anthony Jump
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Peter Anthony Jump brought complaints of disability discrimination against LLW Repository Limited under s13 and ss20/21 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal held that those complaints were presented outside the time limit in s123 Equality Act 2010.
The tribunal further found that it was not just and equitable to allow the claims to proceed. As a result, it concluded that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the complaints presented on 12 July 2022 and dismissed the proceedings.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal held the disability discrimination complaints under s13 and ss20/21 Equality Act 2010 were presented outside the s123 time limit and it was not just and equitable to allow them to proceed, so it did not have jurisdiction to hear them. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.