Case 2405559/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M A Ishfaq v Mediscan Diagnostic Services Ltd HELD AT: Manchester (by CVP) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405559/2022
- Decision date
- 18 August 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kathryn Gibson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M A Ishfaq
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the parties agreed terms of settlement. By consent, all proceedings were stayed until 4pm on 29 February 2024.
The order provided that, without further order, the proceedings would be dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant at that time unless either party notified the Tribunal before then that it did not wish the judgment to take effect. No remedy figures, legal tests, or substantive findings on the claims are recorded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
6 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the parties agreed terms of settlement and that all proceedings were stayed to be dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant unless either party notified the Tribunal that it did not wish the judgment to take effect. | Settled | — | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment records that the parties agreed terms of settlement and that all proceedings were stayed to be dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant unless either party notified the Tribunal that it did not wish the judgment to take effect. | Settled | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the parties agreed terms of settlement and that all proceedings were stayed to be dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant unless either party notified the Tribunal that it did not wish the judgment to take effect. | Settled | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the parties agreed terms of settlement and that all proceedings were stayed to be dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant unless either party notified the Tribunal that it did not wish the judgment to take effect. | Settled | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment records that the parties agreed terms of settlement and that all proceedings were stayed to be dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant unless either party notified the Tribunal that it did not wish the judgment to take effect. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.