Case 2405566/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S McGerty v Track Force Recruitment Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2405566/2022
- Decision date
- 12 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S McGerty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not present a valid response in time, so the Employment Judge made a rule 21 determination on the parts of the claim set out in the judgment. The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £923.04 gross for 1 to 11 May 2022.
The tribunal also held that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. In reaching that conclusion, it found that AlphaPay Payroll Limited and the respondent were associated companies within section 231(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 because both were under the control of Philip Ronnie McKinnell, and that the claimant could count her prior service with AlphaPay Payroll Limited as continuous service. In the alternative, the tribunal found there had been a relevant TUPE transfer on or about 1 May 2020. It treated the claimant as having 4 complete years of service, all after age 40, and awarded £3,426.00 calculated at 1.5 weeks' pay for each complete year.
On notice, the tribunal found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract. It held that, by reason of the TUPE transfers referred to in the judgment, the statutory minimum notice entitlement was 4 weeks. Using the gross weekly pay figure of £576.92 and allowing for mitigation after the claimant obtained alternative employment after 7 working days of the notice period, it awarded £807.66 gross damages.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £692.28 gross for 6 days. The judgment records total awards of £923.04 for arrears of wages, £3,426.00 for redundancy payment, £807.66 for notice pay, and £692.28 for holiday pay, giving a total of £5,848.98.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Determined under rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time; the tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages for 1 to 11 May 2022. | Upheld | — | £923 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment. It counted service with associated employers and/or by reason of a TUPE transfer, giving 4 complete years of service and 1.5 weeks' pay for each year over age 40. | Upheld | — | £3,426 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found dismissal in breach of contract as to notice. It treated the statutory minimum notice period as 4 weeks, then reduced the loss for mitigation after the claimant found alternative employment after 7 working days of the notice period. | Upheld | — | £808 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and awarded 6 days' holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £692 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,849
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.