Case 2405571/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Jonusas v Jackson Transport Solutions Limited & Others — 2020
- Case reference
- 2405571/2019
- Decision date
- 12 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Jonusas
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis is a Rule 21 judgment issued by Employment Judge Shotter in Mr A Jonusas v Jackson Transport Solutions Limited & Others. The judgment states that the claim succeeds, but it does not set out the underlying facts, the pleaded cause of action, or any detailed liability reasoning in the extracted text.
The tribunal recorded that the remedy to which the claimant is entitled would be determined at a Remedy Hearing, with a date to be arranged and notified in due course. No monetary award is contained in this judgment.
On the text available, the judgment is limited to the default-success outcome and does not identify whether the claim was for unlawful deduction from wages, working time, or another tribunal claim. The extract therefore supports only a successful claim with remedy left open for later determination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not specify the legal claim type. It records a Rule 21 judgment that the claim succeeds and that remedy will be determined at a later Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.