Case 2405576/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Barber v Krinvest Care Group – Mapleford Nursing Home — 2022
- Case reference
- 2405576/2022
- Decision date
- 20 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Johnson
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Barber
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs N Barber had been employed at Mapleford Care Home since 14 October 2003 and was appointed Care Manager with effect from 1 March 2022. The respondent did not attend the final hearing and provided no evidence. The tribunal relied on the claimant's witness evidence, which it found credible, together with the documents produced for the hearing.
The tribunal found that after the promotion the claimant was not given a job description or supervision meeting, her previous Care Supervisor duties were gradually removed, and no new duties commensurate with the Care Manager role were provided. When she raised the issue with Joanne Randall, she was told only that they would "work through it" and no grievance or other route for resolving the problem was offered. The claimant resigned on 14 April 2022. Applying the constructive dismissal principles in Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp and section 95(1)(c) ERA 1996, the tribunal held that the respondent's conduct breached the implied term of trust and confidence, that the breach was fundamental, that it caused the resignation, and that the claimant had not affirmed the contract.
The tribunal therefore upheld the complaint of constructive unfair dismissal. For remedy, it found that the claimant had 18 years' service for basic award purposes and had not suffered continuing loss of earnings. It awarded a basic award of £4,088 and a further £500 for loss of statutory rights, making a total award of £4,588.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | Successful constructive unfair dismissal. The tribunal awarded a basic award of £4,088 and £500 for loss of statutory rights. | Upheld | — | £4,588 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,588
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £4,088
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £500
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
5 references- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp 1978 ICR 221
- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- implied term of trust and confidence
- s.98 ERA 1996
- s.98(4) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.