Case 2405581/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Knight v LPC Invest Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405581/2022
- Decision date
- 13 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Knight
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 30 January 2023 before Employment Judge Anderson sitting alone, the parties reached a judgment by consent on the claimant's holiday pay and notice pay claims. The tribunal recorded both claims as well founded and ordered LPC Invest Limited to pay Mr A Knight the gross sum of £614.86.
The written record states that all other claims remained listed to be heard on 11 April 2023. The judgment therefore disposed only of the holiday pay and notice pay claims, and did not determine the remaining claims at that stage.
The tribunal also issued the standard notice on interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, stating the relevant decision day as 13 February 2023 and explaining that interest would only arise if the sum remained unpaid after the 14-day period. No separate interest figure was calculated in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Found well founded by consent; part of a gross award of £614.86 with notice pay. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim found well founded by consent; part of a gross award of £614.86 with holiday pay. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £615
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.