Case 2405588/2022 · Employment Tribunal

Mr J Price v Creations Hair and Barbering Studio and 2 others — 2022

Case reference: 2405588/2022
Decision date: 9 December 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Horne

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

4 named

Claimant

Mr J Price

Respondents

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Horne made a case management order dated 2 December 2022, sent to the parties on 9 December 2022, giving the claimant 14 days to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out because he was not actively pursuing the claim and/or was conducting the case unreasonably. The claimant did not make representations, or did not make sufficient representations, within that period.

On that basis, Employment Judge McDonald struck out the claim on 25 January 2023. The judgment records that the fixed hearing listed for 22 to 24 April 2023 would not go ahead. No liability findings or monetary award were made.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant failed to make representations, or sufficient representations, in response to the case management order dated 2 December 2022 (sent to the parties on 9 December 2022). The order had given the claimant 14 days to explain why the claim should not be struck out for non-pursuit and/or unreasonable conduct, or to request a hearing.	Struck out	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.