Case 2405596/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Department for Business, Energy and Industry — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405596/2022
- Decision date
- 16 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal recorded that Mr F Mohammed's appeal against the Department for Business, Energy and Industry had not been actively pursued. The judgment states that this followed a failure to comply with case management orders and a letter dated 20 February 2023 giving the appellant an opportunity to object to strike out if he wished to do so.
The appellant did not respond to that letter, did not object, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal found that the appeal had not been actively pursued and struck it out under Rule 37(1)(d). No monetary remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment records that the appeal was struck out because it had not been actively pursued after the appellant failed to respond to the Tribunal's letter dated 20 February 2023 and had previously failed to comply with case management orders. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(d) Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.