Case 2405599/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Walby-Dyer v The Spa at 142 Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405599/2019
- Decision date
- 22 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Walby-Dyer
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, in a Rule 21 judgment, found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £1,441.91.
The tribunal also awarded £298.76 under section 24(2) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 as compensation for financial loss attributable to the non-payment, described in the judgment as credit charges incurred through non-payment by the respondent. The hearing listed for 9 September 2019 was cancelled.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of £1,441.91 net, plus £298.76 under section 24(2) ERA 1996 as compensation for financial loss attributable to the non-payment, described as credit charges incurred through non-payment. | Upheld | — | £1,741 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,741
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £299
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.