Case 2405606/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms W Royle v CDC & Partners Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2405606/2021
- Decision date
- 2 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms W Royle
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Phil Allen sat alone at Manchester by CVP on 30 July 2021. The respondent did not attend and had not submitted a response, so the case was determined under Rule 21. The claimant, Ms W Royle, appeared in person.
The tribunal held that CDC & Partners Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,736.11. It also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £288.45.
A further finding was made that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement, and the tribunal ordered payment of £528.83. The judgment directed that the sums due be paid within 14 days of the order being sent to the parties.
The attached interest notice stated that if the award was not paid within 14 days, interest would accrue under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 from 3 August 2021 at the stipulated rate of 8%.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,736 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awards damages for notice pay. | Upheld | — | £288 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states the respondent failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £529 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,553
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.