Case 2405614/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Derby (lay representative) For the v Ms N McGuiness-Bell (Finance Manager) — 2026
- Case reference
- 2405614/2025
- Decision date
- 23 July 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Kenward
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Derby (lay representative) For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr V Evans brought a wrongful dismissal complaint against Airmatic Limited concerning his contractual entitlement to notice of dismissal and notice pay. Employment Judge Kenward, sitting alone, found the complaint not well-founded and dismissed it.
The tribunal also found that the complaint of breach of the right to be accompanied at disciplinary and appeal meetings, under sections 10 and 11 of the Employment Relations Act 1999, was not well-founded and dismissed it. Summary reasons were given orally at the hearing; the written judgment does not set out those reasons. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Complaint of breach of the right to be accompanied at disciplinary and appeal meetings under sections 10 and 11 of the Employment Relations Act 1999. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Relations Act 1999, sections 10 and 11
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.