Case 2405626/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Kaliber Marketing (Holdings) Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 2405626/2018
- Decision date
- 29 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr K Molek brought claims against Kaliber Marketing (Holdings) Ltd for unfair dismissal and breach of contract. Employment Judge Warren found that he was unfairly dismissed and that the respondent was in breach of contract for failing to pay notice pay. The tribunal also found that there was a 50% chance the claimant would have been dismissed fairly even if a fair procedure had been followed, and that he contributed to his dismissal to the extent of 25%.
At remedy, the tribunal recorded that the claimant was born on 8 April 1967, started employment on 21 July 2009, and had an effective date of termination of 5 January 2018. It found that he had eight years' continuous service, that his net weekly pay was £340 and his gross weekly pay was £403, and that he was entitled to eight weeks' statutory notice. It also recorded that he had failed to find work in the UK, had returned to Poland, and had not sought work after 24 August 2018, which was therefore used as the cut-off date for loss of earnings.
The basic award was calculated at £4,836 and reduced by 25% for contributory fault to £3,627.00. The notice-pay award was calculated as eight weeks' net pay of £2,720 plus a 25% increase for failure to follow statutory procedures, giving £3,400. The compensatory award included immediate loss of net earnings of £8,160, loss of statutory rights of £806, and pension loss of £93.12, producing £9,059.12 before adjustments. After a 50% Polkey reduction, a 25% uplift for failure to follow statutory procedure, and a 25% reduction for contributory fault, the final compensatory award was £4,529.56, and the total award was £11,556.56.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was unfairly dismissed. The basic award was calculated at £4,836 less 25% contributory fault, giving £3,627.00. The compensatory award was calculated at £9,059.12 before adjustments, then reduced by 50% for Polkey, increased by 25% for failure to follow statutory procedure, and reduced by 25% for contributory fault, producing £4,529.56. | Upheld | — | £8,157 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the respondent failed to pay notice pay in breach of contract. The remedy schedule later describes the notice-pay head as "wrongful dismissal damages" and calculates it at £3,400. | Upheld | — | £3,400 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £11,557
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £3,627
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £4,530
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Polkey reduction
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.