Case 2405633/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Power v The Pennine Acute Hospitals NHS Trust — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405633/2018
- Decision date
- 2 December 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Power
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought an unlawful deduction from wages claim under the Employment Rights Act 1996. The issues recorded were the respondent requiring him to skip an increment date on 16 February 2016 when he moved from Pay Band 1, Spine Point 1, to Pay Band 1, Spine Point 2, after Spine Point 1 was deleted on 1 April 2015, and the respondent placing his increment date on 1 January 2018 after his successful re-banding to Band 2 with effect from 1 January 2017.
The tribunal held that both issues were not well-founded and failed. The written judgment records the outcome only; it states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the specified time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records two unlawful deduction from wages issues and states that both were not well-founded and failed. Written reasons are not included in the written record because reasons were given orally. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.