Case 2405635/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Shelley Parr v Trinity Leisure Group Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405635/2019
- Decision date
- 26 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Shelley Parr
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded judgment that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £550.99.
The tribunal also recorded judgment that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £81.78 for that entitlement. The written record notes that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the stated time limit.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £550.99. | Upheld | — | £551 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £81.78. | Upheld | — | £82 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £633
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.