Case 2405638/2018 · Employment Tribunal
1. Mr L O’Reilly 2. Mr A Darlington v Liverpool Airport Limited T/A John Lennon Airport — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405638/2018
- Decision date
- 18 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shotter REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
1. Mr L O’Reilly 2. Mr A Darlington
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claims were heard at Liverpool on 3, 4 and 5 June 2019 before Employment Judge Shotter. The respondent was Liverpool Airport Limited T/A John Lennon Airport. The claimants were Mr L O’Reilly and Mr A Darlington, both appearing in person.
The tribunal's judgment states that the first and second claimants were not unfairly dismissed. Their claims for unfair dismissal were therefore found not well-founded and were dismissed. The judgment does not record any separate remedy assessment or monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | First claimant (Mr L O’Reilly): the tribunal held he was not unfairly dismissed and dismissed his unfair dismissal claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Second claimant (Mr A Darlington): the tribunal held he was not unfairly dismissed and dismissed his unfair dismissal claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.