Case 2405640/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Morris v Trinity Leisure Group Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405640/2019
- Decision date
- 26 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Morris
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr D Morris, and the respondent, Trinity Leisure Group Ltd, were not represented at the hearing before Employment Judge Phil Allen at Manchester on 4 November 2019.
The Tribunal recorded that the claimant failed to attend the hearing, following no response to Tribunal letters dated 26 June 2019 and 21 October 2019. On that basis, the claimant's claims were struck out. No remedy was awarded in the written judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's claims were struck out after the claimant failed to attend the hearing and had not responded to Tribunal letters. The specific claims are not described in the judgment text; classification follows the listing categories supplied for this case. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | The judgment states that the claimant's claims were struck out after the claimant failed to attend the hearing and had not responded to Tribunal letters. The specific claims are not described in the judgment text; classification follows the listing categories supplied for this case. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.