Case 2405649/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Dunn v Thomas Wright/Thorite Group Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405649/2019
- Decision date
- 30 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sherratt REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Dunn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester on 22 August 2019 before Employment Judge Sherratt. The claimant, Mr R Dunn, appeared as a litigant in person and the respondent, Thomas Wright/Thorite Group Limited, was represented by Mr P Ritter, HR Manager.
The written judgment states that the claimant's claims were dismissed. The decision record says the reasons were given orally at the hearing, and no written reasons were provided in the published record. The short judgment therefore records the outcome only and does not set out the tribunal's factual findings or any remedy calculation.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The written judgment records only that the claimant's claims were dismissed. The specific claim type is taken from the case listing category rather than the short written reasons, which do not identify individual causes of action. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The written judgment records only that the claimant's claims were dismissed. The specific claim type is taken from the case listing category rather than the short written reasons, which do not identify individual causes of action. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.