Case 2405667/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Maisie Ella Dring v Trinity Leisure Group Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405667/2019
- Decision date
- 26 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Maisie Ella Dring
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found that Trinity Leisure Group Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Miss Dring's wages and ordered it to pay the gross sum of £247.
The Tribunal also found that Miss Dring had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £32.89. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay her holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £31.88.
Reasons were given orally at the hearing. The written judgment records the awards but does not set out further factual findings or legal analysis.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £247. | Upheld | — | £247 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £32.89. | Upheld | — | £33 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £31.88. | Upheld | — | £32 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £312
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.