Case 2405669/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Evita Zena v Trinity Leisure Group Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405669/2019
- Decision date
- 26 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Evita Zena
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded judgment after a hearing at Manchester on 4 November 2019 before Employment Judge Phil Allen. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was not represented.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,401.57. It also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £323.44.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £209.00. The written judgment records the awards but does not include written reasons, as reasons had been given orally unless requested under the stated procedure.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,401.57. | Upheld | — | £1,402 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £323.44. | Upheld | — | £323 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £209.00. | Upheld | — | £209 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,932
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.