Case 2405669/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Richardson v Cableworld Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2405669/2022
- Decision date
- 10 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Newstead Taylor
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Richardson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Newstead Taylor, sitting alone at Manchester, held that Mr J Richardson’s claim for holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998 was well founded. The claim related to holiday taken between 26 January 2022 and 18 April 2022.
The tribunal ordered Cableworld Limited to pay the claimant the agreed sum of £797.89, subject to any deductions for tax and National Insurance contributions. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Holiday pay under the Working Time Regulations 1998 for holiday from 26 January 2022 to 18 April 2022; the tribunal awarded the agreed sum of £797.89 subject to deductions for tax and National Insurance contributions. | Upheld | — | £798 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £798
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.