Case 2405678/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Y Ayadi v The Social Trattoria Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2405678/2023
- Decision date
- 22 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
- Venue
- Manchester
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Y Ayadi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that The Social Trattoria Ltd breached Mr Y Ayadi's contract of employment in relation to notice. It awarded him £519.23 as gross damages for that breach.
The tribunal also found the holiday pay complaint well-founded and ordered payment of £51.91 for accrued but untaken annual leave.
The unfair dismissal claim was dismissed on withdrawal, so no liability finding or dismissal award followed on that claim. The written record also includes the standard notice that interest may become payable under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if the sums awarded remain unpaid after 14 days, but no separate interest figure was quantified in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the respondent breached the claimant's contract of employment in relation to notice and ordered gross damages of £519.23. | Upheld | — | £519 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the holiday pay complaint well-founded and ordered £51.91 for accrued but untaken annual leave. | Upheld | — | £52 |
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states that the unfair dismissal claim was dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £571
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.