Case 2405692/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Bradbury & others (see schedule) v P & L Joinery Sub-Contractors Limited (in creditors voluntary liquidation) and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 2405692/2021
- Decision date
- 19 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Phil Allen
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr J Bradbury & others (see schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimants claimed protective awards arising from alleged breach of collective consultation requirements. The first respondent, which was in creditors voluntary liquidation, did not present a response. The joint liquidators did not object to the proceedings continuing, and the second respondent entered a response. The tribunal issued judgment under Rule 21 without a hearing after considering the file and information provided by the claimants' solicitors.
The tribunal found that all claimants were employed at one establishment, that no trade union was recognised for collective bargaining, consultation or negotiation, and that approximately 35 employees were made redundant at or around the same time. The first respondent dismissed most claimants with immediate effect on 5 February 2021, with a few dismissed on 12 February 2021, and took no steps to arrange election of employee representatives or consult with any such representatives.
The tribunal held that the first respondent breached section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It made protective awards for each claimant listed in the first schedule for the maximum protected period of 90 days beginning on 5 February 2021, while noting that no financial awards were made at this stage and that individual payment disputes would require separate claims under section 192 if necessary.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award claim for breach of collective consultation requirements under sections 188 and 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The tribunal stated that no financial awards were made at this stage; individual awards would need to be quantified separately. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Rule 21
- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 192 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.