Case 2405699/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Harrison v Virosafe Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405699/2022
- Decision date
- 12 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Leach Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs M Harrison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so Employment Judge Leach determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On the papers, the tribunal found that Virosafe Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mrs M Harrison's wages and ordered payment of £1,440 gross, calculated as £720 per month for two months.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £66.46 for two days' holiday. The judgment set out the arithmetic used to reach that figure, using an annual pay rate of £8,640 and converting it to a weekly and daily rate before multiplying by two days.
The total amount ordered was £1,506.46. The written record also included the standard tribunal interest notice, stating that the relevant decision day was 12 January 2023 and the stipulated rate was 8% per annum, but no separate interest sum was quantified in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,440 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £66 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,506
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.