Case 2405700/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Adams v CIS Claims Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405700/2023
- Decision date
- 14 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Franey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Adams
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with the claim under Rule 21 and held that the complaint of breach of contract was well-founded. The judgment records that Miss E Adams was owed money following termination of employment on 9 March 2023, and the respondent CIS Claims Limited was ordered to pay that sum.
The written judgment does not set out a further liability analysis or any split between heads of loss. The only monetary award recorded in the judgment is the gross sum due to the claimant. The accompanying notice explains the interest regime applicable to tribunal awards and states that the relevant decision day was 14 July 2023, with interest beginning on 15 July 2023 if the award remained unpaid after 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the respondent is ordered to pay the claimant the gross sum of '£1.444.07' owing to her following termination of employment on 9 March 2023. The amount appears to be an OCR formatting issue and is read as £1,444.07. | Upheld | — | £1,444 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,444
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.