Case 2405703/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M McMillan v Mobile Bars To You Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2405703/2020
- Decision date
- 4 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M McMillan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr M McMillan presented a claim on 12 May 2020 for holiday pay said to be outstanding when he resigned on 1 March 2020. The respondent filed a response on 15 June 2020, said he had been paid his full salary each month and disputed the calculation, but did not attend the hearing on 16 October 2020 before Employment Judge Batten sitting alone.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence and documents, including his appointment letter, payslips and WhatsApp messages. It found that he was employed on a salary of £27,000 per annum, that the holiday year ran from 1 April to 31 March, and that he was entitled to the statutory minimum of 5.6 weeks' annual leave.
In the final holiday year from 1 April 2019 to 1 March 2020, the tribunal found that the claimant had accrued 26 days of holiday entitlement, had taken 8 bank holidays and a further 9 days of holiday, and therefore had 9 days of untaken holiday remaining. It awarded him £934.65 gross holiday pay for that entitlement. The judgment notice also set out the standard interest information, but no separate interest sum was included in the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence that 9 days of accrued untaken holiday remained unpaid on termination. It awarded gross holiday pay of £934.65. | Upheld | — | £935 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £935
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.