Case 2405714/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Salvatore Infante v Donatello`s Restaurant — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405714/2019
- Decision date
- 1 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Salvatore Infante
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Hoey entered judgment under Rule 21 in favour of Mr Salvatore Infante against Donatello's Restaurant. The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,248.00 gross.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages, or had failed to pay him for accrued paid annual leave untaken at the termination of his employment. It ordered payment of £1,716.96 gross for that head of claim, described in the judgment as representing two years' leave entitlement from May 2017 to May 2019.
The judgment and notice record that the written judgment was sent to the parties on 30 September 2019. The attached interest notice stated that unpaid sums would carry interest under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990 if not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day, with 1 October 2019 as the calculation day and 8% as the stipulated rate.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £1,248.00 for an unauthorised deduction from wages. | Upheld | — | £1,248 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £1,716.96 gross for unpaid accrued paid annual leave untaken at termination, described as representing two years' leave entitlement from May 2017 to May 2019. | Upheld | — | £1,717 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,965
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.