Case 2405723/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. K. Duffield v G4S Secure Solutions (UK) Ltd HELD BY: CVP — 2021
- Case reference
- 2405723/2020
- Decision date
- 16 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. K. Duffield
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the preliminary hearing on 6 August 2021, Employment Judge T. Vincent Ryan held that Mr Duffield was estopped from pursuing any claim in respect of holiday pay or payment of wages that pre-dated 7 March 2020. The tribunal recorded that an ACAS COT3 settlement had been entered into on 6 March 2020, and that this prevented the claimant from litigating those earlier claims.
The tribunal also held that the claimant was not estopped from continuing with claims for non-payment of holiday pay in the period from 7 March 2020 to the date the claim was presented on 19 May 2020, if any such claim existed, or any later claims by amendment if an amendment application succeeded. No monetary award was made at this hearing.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Preliminary estoppel ruling. The tribunal held that the claimant was estopped, because of an ACAS COT3 settlement entered into on 6 March 2020, from pursuing any claim in respect of holiday pay or payment of wages that pre-dated 7 March 2020. The tribunal also held that he was not estopped from continuing with claims for non-payment of holiday pay between 7 March 2020 and the date of presentation of the claim on 19 May 2020, if any. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.