Miss A Woollam v Torus 62 Ltd — 2023

Case reference: 2405725/2022
Decision date: 27 June 2023
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Buzzard Date

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss A Woollam

Respondent

Torus 62 Ltd

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

By a letter dated 14 April 2023, the Tribunal gave Miss A Woollam an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The stated reasons were that she had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 22 February 2023 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.

The claimant did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. As a result, the hearing listed for 29 April to 3 May 2024 would not take place. No substantive findings on the merits of the underlying claims were made, and no remedy was awarded.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment does not determine the underlying substantive claim types; it records that the claim was struck out under rule 37 for non-compliance with the Tribunal's order of 22 February 2023 and because it had not been actively pursued.	Struck out	—	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.