Case 2405734/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Brown and others (see attached schedule) Mr P Walthall v Harry Fairclough Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2405734/2020
- Decision date
- 26 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Brown and others (see attached schedule) Mr P Walthall
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with claims for a protective award brought by Mr J Brown and others against Harry Fairclough Limited (in administration). No response was presented by the respondent, and the administrators had consented to the claims proceeding. The tribunal therefore issued judgment under Rule 21 on the papers and without a hearing.
On the information before it, the tribunal found that the respondent employed over 20 employees at each site where the claimants worked and that there was no trade union recognised for collective bargaining, consultation or negotiation. It found that, at a meeting on 20 February 2020, employees were told that the respondent was closing down and that they were being made redundant with immediate effect, and that the company entered administration on that date.
The tribunal found that there had been no proper warning or notice and no consultation with the workforce. It also found that no employee representatives had been elected or appointed for consultation within section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. In those circumstances, it held that the respondent was in breach of section 188.
The tribunal therefore made a protective award in favour of the claimants for the maximum protected period of 90 days commencing on 20 February 2020 under section 189(3). It also stated that the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996 applied to the awards and set out the respondent’s recoupment obligations.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under sections 188 and 189 TULRCA 1992 for failure to comply with collective consultation requirements. The tribunal proceeded under Rule 21 without a hearing because the respondent presented no response. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- Rule 21
- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.189(3) TULRCA 1992
- s.188A TULRCA 1992
- Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseeker’s Allowance and Income Support) Regulations 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.