Case 2405735/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr James Bentley v AFC Fylde Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2405735/2022
- Decision date
- 27 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr James Bentley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Manchester via CVP on 26 October 2022 before Employment Judge Anderson sitting alone. The parties were represented by counsel for both sides. No merits findings were made in the judgment.
The judgment states that, upon the parties agreeing terms of settlement, subject to contract, the matter was stayed to 7 December 2022. If the Claimant did not contact the Tribunal to apply to lift the stay before that date, the claims would be dismissed without further order. The written record also notes that reasons were given orally and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the parties agreed terms of settlement, subject to contract, and the matter was stayed to 7 December 2022, with dismissal to follow without further order if the Claimant did not apply to lift the stay. | Settled | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records that the parties agreed terms of settlement, subject to contract, and the matter was stayed to 7 December 2022, with dismissal to follow without further order if the Claimant did not apply to lift the stay. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.