Case 2405750/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss F Davis v Computer Planet Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2405750/2019
- Decision date
- 1 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Peck
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss F Davis
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Davis's holiday pay claim was withdrawn, and the judgment records that it was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. Separately, by consent, Computer Planet Limited was ordered to pay her £3,600 gross in relation to unpaid wages, described as an underpayment in February 2019 and non-payment of wages for the period 1 March 2019 to 15 April 2019.
The judgment states that the unfair dismissal and breach of contract claims, together with the respondent's counterclaim, remained outstanding. The document is a short written record of the decision and does not contain reasons on the merits of those unresolved claims.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The judgment records that the holiday pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the respondent was ordered to pay £3,600 gross in relation to unpaid wages, described as an underpayment in February 2019 and non-payment for 1 March 2019 to 15 April 2019. | Settled | — | £3,600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,600
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.