Case 2405784/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Walsh v Vital Infrastructure Asset Management (VIAM) Limited (In Administration) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405784/2022
- Decision date
- 4 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Batten Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Walsh
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 31 March 2023, the Tribunal gave Miss G Walsh an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out. The reason given was that she had failed to reply to the Tribunal's correspondence of 30 September 2022 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
Miss Walsh did not make representations in writing, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim. The judgment records no substantive determination of the underlying merits and no remedy award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal struck out the claim because the claimant did not reply to the Tribunal's correspondence of 30 September 2022, the claim had not been actively pursued, and the claimant did not make sufficient representations or request a hearing in response to the letter dated 31 March 2023. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.