Case 2405798/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Carberry v Integrity Pub Management Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 2405798/2020
- Decision date
- 15 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Carberry
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary status judgment. The tribunal held that Mr L Carberry was an employee for the unfair dismissal claim and a worker for the unlawful deduction from wages claim under section 230 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It recorded that he had signed a contract of employment on 13 March 2015 as Pub Manager and Company Director, with salary of £11,000 per annum, fixed hours, PAYE pay, and responsibility for administration, accounts and VAT returns.
The tribunal found that when Mr Greaves and Mr Ashton acquired shares in January 2018, the claimant's contract of employment was not terminated and continued alongside his reduced shareholding. It accepted that no notice or P45 had been issued, that the previous accountant remained involved, and that the claimant continued to deal with VAT returns and company accounts. It rejected the respondent's reliance on the statutory declaration signed on 2 February 2018 stating that the respondent had no 'bona fide' employees and did not owe more than £5,000 to creditors.
Applying the authorities it had cited on employee and worker status, including Ready Mixed Concrete, Carmichael, Montgomery v Johnson Underwood, Windle, Westwood, Bates van Winkelhof and James v Redcats, the tribunal concluded that the employment contract remained in place until the claimant's removal as a director in December 2019. The judgment records no monetary award or remedy calculation.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary status issue only; the tribunal found Mr Carberry was an employee for the unfair dismissal claim, but this judgment did not decide the substantive merits of the unfair dismissal complaint. | Other | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Preliminary status issue only; the tribunal found Mr Carberry was a worker for the unlawful deduction from wages claim, but this judgment did not determine any wage deduction amount or substantive liability on the complaint. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
11 references- s.94 ERA 1996
- s.13 ERA 1996
- s.230(1) ERA 1996
- s.230(3) ERA 1996
- Ready Mixed Concrete (South East) Ltd v Ministry of Pensions and National Insurance
- Carmichael v National Power Plc
- Montgomery v Johnson Underwood Ltd
- Secretary of State for Justice v Windle
- Hospital Medical Group Ltd v Westwood
- Clyde & Co LLP v Bates van Winkelhof
- James v Redcats (Brands) Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.