Case 2405802/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr AJ Hollinrake v Guardian Security (South West) Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405802/2019
- Decision date
- 5 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ross
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr AJ Hollinrake
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Ross determined the matter under Rule 21. The tribunal declared that Guardian Security Group Limited owed Mr AJ Hollinrake a redundancy payment of £14,379.47 and ordered that sum to be paid within 14 days of the date of judgment.
The tribunal also found that the claimant’s claim for £2,732.68 in unpaid wages was well founded and ordered the respondent to pay that amount within 14 days. The judgment does not set out any further findings of fact or separate breakdown beyond those two monetary awards.
A separate notice on interest accompanied the judgment. It states the relevant decision day as 5 November 2019, the calculation day as 6 November 2019, and the stipulated rate of interest as 8% if sums were not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment declares that the respondent owes a redundancy payment in this amount. | Upheld | — | £14,379 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for unpaid wages is well founded and orders payment of this amount. | Upheld | — | £2,733 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £17,112
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.