Case 2405810/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Handley v New Focus Health Care Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 2405810/2019
- Decision date
- 17 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Handley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 29 August 2019 before Employment Judge Holmes, by consent the respondent's name was amended to New Focus Health Care Limited and the tribunal ordered it to pay the claimant £646 in respect of deductions from wages and £144 in respect of losses sustained because of those deductions. The judgment does not set out findings on liability; it records the monetary order as a consent judgment.
The claimant's remaining claims relating to annual leave entitlement were withdrawn and dismissed upon that withdrawal. The attached notice records the standard statutory interest provisions under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990, including a relevant decision day of 17 September 2019 and a calculation day of 18 September 2019.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | By consent, the tribunal ordered payment of £646 in respect of deductions from wages and £144 in respect of losses sustained by reason of those deductions. | Settled | — | £790 |
| Working time regulations | The claimant's remaining claims relating to annual leave entitlement were withdrawn and dismissed upon that withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £790
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.