Case 2405810/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms T Rawlings (1) Mr A J Rawlings (2) v White Pearl Care — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405810/2023
- Decision date
- 14 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms T Rawlings (1) Mr A J Rawlings (2)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs T Rawlings and Mr A J Rawlings brought complaints of unlawful deduction from wages and holiday pay against White Pearl Care. The tribunal held that each claimant's unlawful deduction from wages complaint under section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996 was successful. It ordered the respondent to pay Ms T Rawlings £791.26 and Mr A J Rawlings £3,115.40.
The holiday pay complaints were no longer pursued by either claimant and were dismissed upon withdrawal. The tribunal's notice records that, if the awards are not paid within 14 days after the relevant decision day of 13 November 2023, interest may accrue from 14 November 2023 at the stipulated rate of 8% under the Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | First claimant Ms T Rawlings. The tribunal found the complaint under section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996 successful and ordered payment of £791.26. | Upheld | — | £791 |
| Holiday pay | The complaint was no longer pursued by the first claimant and was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Second claimant Mr A J Rawlings. The tribunal found the complaint under section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996 successful and ordered payment of £3,115.40. | Upheld | — | £3,115 |
| Holiday pay | The complaint was no longer pursued by the second claimant and was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,907
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Employment Tribunals (Interest) Order 1990
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.