Case 2405820/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Judge v Centrica plc — 2020
- Case reference
- 2405820/2020
- Decision date
- 13 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Judge
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the claim at Manchester by CVP on 9 November 2020 before Employment Judge Ainscough. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment records that the claim was for unlawful deduction from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The claim was unsuccessful and was dismissed. Oral reasons were given at the hearing, and the written judgment does not set out further reasoning.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim of unlawful deduction from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was unsuccessful and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.