Case 2405825/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A Moore v Wirral Council — 2020
- Case reference
- 2405825/2019
- Decision date
- 25 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Holmes
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A Moore
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 29 January 2020, the tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claims should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not make any written representations and did not request a hearing.
The tribunal therefore struck out the claims. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of the claim(s), and no remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment does not break down the underlying claims individually; this entry reflects the disability discrimination claim category shown on the case listing/context. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment does not identify the specific allegations, only that the claims were struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment does not identify the specific allegations, only that the claims were struck out for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
| Other | Used for the health and safety category shown in the case context, which is not mapped to a more specific enum in the extraction taxonomy. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.