Case 2405831/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J A Leon Lopez v Esto Es Espana Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2405831/2023
- Decision date
- 31 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ainscough
- Venue
- Liverpool
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J A Leon Lopez
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr J A Leon Lopez worked as the respondent's Head Chef from 1 April 2021 to 2 April 2023. The respondent did not file a response, so Employment Judge Ainscough determined the case under rule 21 on the claimant's evidence and documents at a hearing in Liverpool, with the claimant assisted by an interpreter.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant worked 40 hours in his final week at £12 per hour and had not been paid £480. It also accepted that, over the final 12 months, pension deductions were not remitted and the employer did not make its own 3% pension contributions, producing an award of £1,268.27, and that the claimant was owed two weeks' notice pay of £862.32 after his employment was ended without notice.
The respondent's business had ceased to trade, so the claimant qualified for a redundancy payment of £1,293.48. On holiday pay, the tribunal found that he had been prevented from taking 15 days' annual leave in 2022 because the kitchen was under-resourced and he was the only chef; that leave carried over, and with a further 7 days accrued by termination he was owed £1,897.06 under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and King v Sash Window Workshop Ltd. The total award was £5,801.13.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid final week's wages for 40 hours at £12 per hour. | Upheld | — | £480 |
| Breach of contract | Award covered unpaid pension-related sums (£647.40 employee deductions not remitted plus £620.87 employer contributions) and two weeks' notice pay (£862.32). | Upheld | — | £2,131 |
| Redundancy | Business had ceased to trade; the claimant had two years' service and was over 41 throughout employment. | Upheld | — | £1,293 |
| Holiday pay | 15 days of 2022 annual leave carried over because the claimant could not take it; 7 further days had accrued on termination. | Upheld | — | £1,897 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £5,801
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 86 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- King v Sash Window Workshop Ltd (C-214/16)
- sections 135, 139, 155 and 162 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.